Dieselgate Group Litigation
This is a group action, arising out of the Dieselgate scandal in 2016, involving 1.2 million claimants claiming damages of more than £6 billion.
The Pan-Nox Emissions Group Litigation
11KBW barristers are instructed in commercial disputes which require innovative problem solving, strategic acumen and clinical advocacy.
11KBW has a particular reputation in civil fraud, business protection, company and partnership law. Many of our cases concern the breakdown of shareholder, partnership, LLP, joint venture or employment relationships. They often involve allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, conspiracy and fraud, and require asset-tracing and injunctive relief.
A significant part of our commercial practice is international. We appear in overseas jurisdictions and in arbitrations with overseas seats, collaborating with local counsel. We welcome instructions from in-house counsel and overseas lawyers, in addition to our work with domestic law firms.
This is a group action, arising out of the Dieselgate scandal in 2016, involving 1.2 million claimants claiming damages of more than £6 billion.
The Pan-Nox Emissions Group Litigation
The High Court is hearing this fraud claim worth more than $1 billion, which was brought by the Kuwaiti social security system and pension fund.
The Public Institution for Social Security v Al Rajaan and Others
This heavy-duty litigation concerned an alleged “team move” in the reinsurance industry involving allegations of conspiracy.
Guy Carpenter and Company Ltd v Howden Group Holdings Ltd
The High Court and Court of Appeal determined issues of the construction of the terms of a deferred compensation plan for employees. The claim arose from the US Government’s bailout of AIG during the financial crisis of 2008.
AIG Financial Products Corp v Gruber [2020] EWCA Civ 31
This was Bermuda Form arbitration involving a claim in excess of £100 million for alleged business interruption losses caused by Covid-19.
X v Y
The High Court determined these section 68 proceedings (challenge for procedural irregularity) in relation to an LCIA Arbitration concerning sale and supply of organic produce from Eastern Europe.
P v Q [2020] EWHC 1688 (Comm)
The High Court determined a claim involving over 1,500 claimants arising out of an alleged cartel in the frozen orange juice concentrate market in Brazil. Earlier in proceedings, the Court of Appeal determined the validity of pre-service amendments to the claim form and the question of whether Brazilian law heirs had standing to sue.
Viegas and Others v Cutrale and Another [2023] EWHC 1896 (Comm), [2023] EWHC 2329 (Comm), [2025] 1 W.L.R. 1467 (CA); [2025] EWHC 3158 (Comm)
The High Court dismissed a claim brought by a topco and subsidiary against a current director of the topco, who was also a former director and employee of the subsdiary, for breach of contractual and fiduciary duties.
FMTS Ltd and Another v Friend and Another [2025] EWHC 2897 (KB)
The Court of Appeal dismissed a claim to set aside an earlier judgment on the ground that it had been obtained by fraud. The Master of the Rolls provided guidance on the proper approach to this type of claim.
Tinkler v Esken Ltd [2023] Ch 451 (CA)

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News