Mental Health Aftercare
The Supreme Court interpreted the aftercare rules in the Mental Health Act 1983 for individuals following multiple periods of mental health confinement.
R (Worcs CC) v SSHSC [2023] 1 WLR 2790 (SC)
11KBW has a leading reputation in health and community care law. Clients come to us when they face regulatory or commercial challenges, or when they need answers to difficult questions relating to statutory duties and procurement obligations.
We have a deep understanding of this complex and specialist sector in which we focus on clear and practical solutions.
Work in this field often raises sensitive issues which we handle with tact and discretion.
The Supreme Court interpreted the aftercare rules in the Mental Health Act 1983 for individuals following multiple periods of mental health confinement.
R (Worcs CC) v SSHSC [2023] 1 WLR 2790 (SC)
This judgment of the Administrative Court is the leading case on care home fees.
R (Care North East Northumb.) v Northumb. CC [2024] PTSR 1593 [2024] EWHC 1370 (Admin)
The Supreme Court determined when the High Court can use its inherent jurisdiction to authorise placement of a child in unregistered secure accommodation, when there were not enough places available in registered secure children’s homes.
Re T [2022] AC 723 (SC)
The Administrative Court considered a challenge to the Government’s decision to discharge hospital patients into care homes during the first wave of Covid-19.
R (Gardner) v SSHSC [2022] PTSR 1338 (Admin)
The Court of Appeal considered whether the contractual dispute resolution mechanism for GP contracting disputes is amenable to judicial review.
R (Shashikanth) v NHS Litigation Authority and NHSE [2025] 1 WLR 2333 (CA)
The Court of Appeal’s judgment in this case was a significant decision on the obligations of local authorities to children who may be children in need under the Children Act 1989.
R (TW) v Essex CC [2025] EWCA Civ 4 (CA)
The Court of Appeal’s judgment address the interrelationship between duties to accommodate children under the Children Act 1989 and statutory homelessness duties.
R (DF) v Essex CC [2025] PTSR 806 (CA)
The Administrative Court considered whether social care charging which exempts the earned income of disabled persons from charging is unlawfully discriminatory against severely disabled people who are unable to work.
SH v Norfolk CC [2021] PTSR 969 (Admin)
The Court of Appeal considered whether the conferral of diplomatic immunity from child protection proceedings was compatible with Article 3 ECHR.
Barnet LBC v AG (A Child) [2023] Fam. 261 (CA)
The Administrative Court’s judgment is the leading authority on the application of the “Greenwich principle” when determining “ordinary residence” under the Care Act 2014.
R (Lancs CC) v SSHSC [2021] EWHC 268 (Admin)

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News