“A tower of strength with incredible capacity for work and someone you would always want on your team” (Legal 500)
Ronnie is ranked as a leading junior in his two main practice areas: employment and public law.
He is described as “excellent all-round” – “very impressive on his feet”, “great tactical insight”, “great paperwork, great cross-examination, and great advocacy” (Chambers UK Bar/ Legal 500). He is also recommended as “client-friendly”, “highly commercial in terms of looking at what the client wants as an end game”, and someone who, “Keeps things simple and to the point, effectively manages the litigation, and makes the key points heard” (Legal 500).
Ronnie is regularly instructed in complex discrimination and whistleblowing claims, and has acted as sole counsel in employment matters in the EAT and Court of Appeal. He also specialises in employee competition claims, and has acted in a number of confidential information, restrictive covenant and team move cases.
Ronnie’s public law practice encompasses all areas of judicial review, with a particular focus on claims with a commercial context. He has acted in a number of high-profile judicial review claims on behalf of private companies, local authorities and central government.
Commercial Dispute Resolution
Ronnie has acted in a broad range of employee competition disputes, including claims for breach of restrictive covenants, misuse of confidential information and economic torts. Ronnie’s other commercial work includes claims for breach of contract, fraudulent misrepresentation and professional negligence (see case examples further below).
Examples of his work in the field of employee competition include:
Equity broker competition
Acting for an equity brokerage defending claims for declaratory relief as to the enforceability of a broker’s notice period and restrictive covenants; and counterclaiming for overpaid commission. Led by James Laddie QC.
Non-compete and confidentiality clauses
Acting for the Head of Marketing of a global chemical manufacturer in dispute with his employer over the terms on which he could join a competitor. Issues included the enforceability of non-compete and confidentiality clauses in his contract of employment.
Multinational team move litigation
Acting for a leading business advisory firm in team move litigation against former employees in the UK, Dubai, Hong Kong and India. Claims included breach of express and implied duties of loyalty and fiduciary duty, inducing breach of contract and unlawful means conspiracy. The parties also sought declarations as to the enforceability of non-compete, non-dealing and non-poaching clauses in the employees’ contracts of employment. Ronnie was led by James Laddie QC.
Team move litigation
(2018 – 2020)
Acting for two former employees of a commercial real estate company defending claims they had conspired together and with others, including a recruitment consultancy and their new employer, to execute an unlawful team move. Claims included breach of the duty of fidelity and post-termination restraints, misuse of confidential information, inducing breach of contract and unlawful means conspiracy.
Confidentiality and data protection
(November – December 2018)
Acting for a Fund Manager accused of hacking his employer’s email accounts and misusing confidential information. Claims included breach of the duty of fidelity and fiduciary duty, breach of confidence, misuse of private information and breach of the DPA and GDPR. Ronnie was led by Anya Proops QC.
Urgent injunction without notice
The High Court granted an urgent injunction at a hearing without notice, to prevent a solicitor from using or disclosing client lists and other confidential information he had taken from his employer. Ronnie acted for the successful applicant.
Non-compete and confidentiality clauses
Acting for a former employee of a worldwide chemical manufacturer, defending claims she would breach non-compete and confidentiality clauses in her contract of employment by continuing in her role with a new employer.
Non-solicit and non-dealing clauses
The High Court granted an interim injunction to enforce non-solicit and non-dealing clauses in a former employee’s contract of employment. Ronnie acted for the successful applicant.
Examples of Ronnie’s other commercial work include:
Cahane v The Investigative Journal Ltd
 EWHC 2344 (QB)
Senior Master Fontaine awarded the Claimant damages and costs in excess of £225,000 for fraudulent misrepresentation by her former employer. This followed default judgment being entered for the Claimant, in her claims that she was induced to join the Defendant as Editor-in-Chief by misrepresentations about the nature of the journal and the job she would perform. Ronnie acted for the Claimant.
– Acting for an outdoor goods supplier defending claims for breach of the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993;
– Acting for a property asset manager defending claims for negligence and breach of contract in connection with an interest rate hedging arrangement;
– Acting for a Cloud Software company bringing claims against an employee for failing to carry out his work with reasonable skill and competence;
– Obtaining a High Court injunction to prevent a sampling agency from dealing with clients in breach of a contract for the sale of goodwill; and
– Acting for employees and employers bringing/ defending contractual claims for unpaid bonuses and commission.
Ronnie’s employment practice encompasses:
- the full range of claims in the Employment Tribunal, with a particular focus on discrimination, equal pay and whistleblowing claims;
- industrial relations disputes; and
- employee competition claims: see further under “Commercial Dispute Resolution” above.
Examples of his work in this field include:
Covid-19 whistleblowing claims
The Employment Tribunal rejected claims for whistleblowing detriment and dismissal brought by a former employee of a financial recruitment consultancy, who claimed to have made protected disclosures about breach of Covid-19 regulations. Ronnie acted for the successful employer.
Queensgate Investments LLP v Millet
 ICR 863;  IRLR 637
The EAT ruled that interim relief hearings in the Employment Tribunal must be heard in public, unless the Tribunal makes an Order under Rule 50 of the ET Rules 2013. Ronnie acted for the Appellant, led by Sean Jones QC.
Headley v Sensyne Health plc
(April – May 2020)
Ronnie acted for Sensyne’s former Chief Financial Officer in his whistleblowing claims against the company and its CEO, Lord Drayson. The litigation was reported in the Times, Telegraph and Financial Times.
Bird & Rashid v Morrison Data Services (Water) Ltd
The claimants were two Trade Union Representatives who claimed their employer had subjected them to detriments for their trade union activities. The Tribunal dismissed all claims after a 5-day hearing. Ronnie acted for the successful employer.
Law firm’s bonus policy not discriminatory
The Employment Tribunal ruled that a bonus policy operated by a multinational law firm, which did not reduce hours targets for time spent on holiday, was neither directly nor indirectly discriminatory on grounds of maternity or gender. Ronnie acted for the successful law firm.
Beal v Avery Homes (Nelson) Ltd
 6 WLUK 89
The High Court conducted the equivalent of a “Stage 2” hearing in equal pay claims brought by over 70 female care workers. The judgment contains helpful guidance on what constitutes a person’s work for the purposes of any equal value assessment. Ronnie acted for the claimants, led by Sean Jones QC.
R. (Independent Workers Union of Great Britain) v Central Arbitration Committee
 I.R.L.R. 530
The High Court rejected claims that workers have a right to compulsory collective bargaining with a third party who is not their employer under Art. 11 ECHR. Ronnie acted for the University of London, led by Christopher Jeans QC.
Patel-Jones v Babylon Partners Ltd
The Employment Tribunal dismissed claims for direct disability discrimination (including by association), harassment, failure to make reasonable adjustments, whistleblowing detriment and automatic unfair dismissal after a 12-day hearing. Ronnie acted for the successful employer.
Ayodele v Citylink Ltd
 I.R.L.R. 114
The Court of Appeal ruled that employees bringing claims for discrimination bear the initial burden of proof under the Equality Act 2010, despite the change in wording as compared with the pre-EqA legislation. Read more about the case here.
Extraterritorial discrimination claims
The Employment Tribunal ruled that it had territorial jurisdiction to determine claims for unfair dismissal and discrimination brought by an Engineering Manager against a multinational oil and gas company, relying on acts alleged to have occurred in the USA. Ronnie acted for the successful claimant.
Tribunal grants interim relief in whistleblowing claim
The Employment Tribunal granted interim relief to a Senior Director of Business Development in his whistleblowing claim against his former employer, a multinational computer services company. The Tribunal was satisfied that the claimant was likely to succeed in showing that he was dismissed for making protected disclosures about sexual harassment and tax fraud, rather than for poor performance as alleged by the company. Ronnie acted for the successful claimant.
Merseyrail Electrics 2002 Ltd v National Union of Rail Maritime and Transport Workers  EWHC 515 (QB)
Merseyrail sought an injunction to prevent RMT members from going out on strike in connection with the introduction of driver only operated trains. Ronnie acted for Merseyrail, led by Bruce Carr QC.
Other Employment Tribunal cases include:
- Acting for employees and employers bringing/ defending applications for interim relief in whistleblowing cases;
- Acting for employees and employers at hearings to determine issues under TUPE, including whether there has been a relevant transfer and assignment;
- Acting for a leading UK housebuilder defending claims of disability and age discrimination, victimisation and unfair dismissal at a 10-day hearing;
- Acting for an overseas bank defending claims for discrimination, whistleblowing and automatic unfair dismissal on a TUPE transfer at a 15-day hearing. Led by Jane Mulcahy QC;
- Acting for a high street bank defending claims for disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments and unfair dismissal at a 7-day hearing;
- Acting for a national rail company defending its shift premium policy against claims for indirect sex discrimination;
- Acting for a nationwide retailer defending claims for indirect sex discrimination and unfair dismissal arising out of a redundancy process at a 7-day hearing.
Ronnie’s public law practice encompasses all areas of judicial review, with a particular focus on claims with a commercial context. He also specialises in State aid and public procurement: see separately below.
Examples of his work in this field include:
R. (United Trade Action Group Ltd) v Transport for London
 EWHC 3290 (Admin)
The Divisional Court ruled that: (i) the Private Hire Vehicles (London) Act 1998 requires operators who accept bookings from passengers to contract with them to provide the journey; and (ii) private hire vehicles using ride-hailing apps are not “plying for hire”, and therefore do not require black cab licenses. Ronnie acted for the Interested Party, led by Philip Kolvin QC.
R. (Williams) v Caerphilly County Borough Council
 EWCA Civ 296,  PTSR 1130
The Court of Appeal dismissed a challenge to the Council’s decision to adopt a 10-year leisure strategy. The strategy was not a relevant arrangement within the scope of the Welsh improvement duty (akin to best value in England); or contrary to the Council’s budget, so that the decision could properly be taken by Cabinet. Ronnie acted for the Council, led by James Goudie QC. Read more about the case here.
R. (L) v Buckinghamshire CC
Supperstone J rejected the claimant’s application for interim relief to prevent the council from taking any further steps to implement a decision to repurpose 19 of its 35 children’s centres. Ronnie acted for the Council.
R. (Independent Workers Union of Great Britain) v Central Arbitration Committee
 I.R.L.R. 530
Supperstone J rejected claims that workers have a right to compulsory collective bargaining with a third party who is not their employer under Art. 11 ECHR. Ronnie acted for the University of London, led by Christopher Jeans QC.
R. (Mas Group Holdings Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
 2 WLUK 12
The claimant challenged the defendant’s policy of refusing to allow animal exporters to use a route via Ireland unless a shorter route via the Channel was unavailable. The claimant argued the policy constituted a disproportionate restraint on trade contrary to the EU Regulation for the protection of animals during transport and Art. 35 TFEU. Ronnie acted for the claimant, led by Conor Quigley QC.
R (Hussain) v Sandwell Metropolitan BC
 P.T.S.R. 142
An elected member of the council sought judicial review of on-going investigations into allegations against him. Green J dismissed the claim, ruling that the Council had the power to investigate under s. 28 of the Localism Act 2011, and that the process had not been tainted by actual or apparent bias. Ronnie acted for the Council, led by James Goudie QC. Read more about the case here.
R. (Justice for Health Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health
 A.C.D. 119
Green J dismissed claims that the Health Secretary’s decision to approve a new contract for junior doctors in the NHS in England was unlawful. The Judge found that the decision was within the scope of his powers, complied with his duty of transparency and was not irrational. Ronnie acted for the the Health Secretary, led by Clive Sheldon QC.
R. (British Medical Association) v Secretary of State for Health
The BMA sought to challenge the Health Secretary’s decision to approve a new contract for junior doctors in the NHS in England, arguing that he had failed to comply with the Public Sector Equality Duty. Ronnie acted for the Health Secretary, led by Clive Sheldon QC.
R (O’Neill) v Lambeth LBC
Lang J dismissed a challenge to the Council’s decision to vary a lease on the South Bank of the River Thames as part of the Garden Bridge project. The Judge found that the decision was within the Council’s powers, did not involve any disposal of land under the LGA 1972, and that Reg. 13(1) of the Asset of Community Value (England) Regulations 2012 was intra vires. Ronnie acted for the Council, led by Clive Sheldon QC.
R (Logan) v Havering LBC
 P.T.S.R. 603
Blake J ruled that a Council Tax Reduction Scheme, under which all taxpayers paid some council tax except in cases of exceptional hardship, was not discriminatory on grounds of age or disability. Ronnie acted for the Council, led by Clive Sheldon QC.
R (Sky Blue Sports and Leisure Ltd) v Coventry City Council
 B.L.G.R. 616
Hickinbottom J ruled that the Council had not acted irrationally or failed to take account of relevant considerations when it made a loan of £14.4m to the company that manages the Ricoh Arena in Coventry. Ronnie acted for the Council, led by James Goudie QC.
Sky Blue Sports & Leisure Ltd v Coventry City Council
 A.C.D. 48
The claimant applied for specific disclosure between its application for permission to seek judicial review having been refused, and the oral renewal hearing. Silber J refused the application. Ronnie acted for the Council, led by James Goudie QC.
Procurement & State Aid
Ronnie also specialises in State aid and public procurement. He acted for Coventry City Council in the leading domestic cases on the private investor test for State aid: R. (Sky Blue Sports and Leisure Ltd) v Coventry City Council (see further below).
Examples of his work in the field of State aid include:
Defending challenge to the Mayoral Infrastructure Levy (2019)
The claimant sought to challenge the Mayor of London’s levy on new commercial, retail and hotel development across London. The claim raised complex issues around the application of the State aid rules to different rates of taxation for different uses in different areas. Ronnie acted for the Mayor of London, led by Jonathan Moffett QC.
R. (Sky Blue Sports and Leisure Ltd) v Coventry City Council (No. 3)
 EWCA Civ 2252
The owners of Coventry City Football Club argued that the Council had granted a State aid to Wasps RFC by selling its interests in the Ricoh Arena at an undervalue. The Court of Appeal upheld the Judge’s decision that the claim was unarguable. The Council had been entitled to rely on an independent valuation from KPMG, which demonstrated that it had complied with the private vendor test. Ronnie acted for the Council, led by James Goudie QC.
R. (Sky Blue Sports and Leisure Ltd) v Coventry City Council (No. 2)
 EWCA Civ 453
The owners of Coventry City Football Club argued that the Council had granted a State aid to the operator of the Ricoh Arena, ACL, by lending it £14.4m on non-commercial terms. The Court of Appeal upheld the Judge’s decision dismissing the claim. The Court’s judgment contains a helpful summary of the principles to be applied under the private investor test. Applying those principles, a private investor might also have made the loan because it was at a commercial rate of interest and safeguarded the Council’s 50% share in ACL. Ronnie acted for the Council, led by James Goudie QC.
R. (Sky Blue Sports and Leisure Ltd) v Coventry City Council (No. 1)
 EWHC 1747
Hickinbottom J refused the claimants permission to rely on expert evidence in their claim for judicial review of the Council’s loan to ACL, which they argued constituted a State aid.
Examples of Ronnie’s work in the field of public procurement include:
• Acting for a local authority defending claims for breach of the PCR 2015 in connection with a tender for waste, recycling and street cleaning services. Led by Jason Coppel QC;
• Advising a local authority on the implications of abandoning a public procurement in response to a potential challenge;
• Advising a local authority on award criteria for all of its public contracts;
• Advising a local authority on proposals to reduce the services required under an on-going public contract;
• Advising a local authority on the application of the PCR 2015 to proposals to outsource certain services;
• Advising a local authority on the distinction between public service and concession contracts; and how to deal with a change in contract terms.
“He gets on top of complex facts and law, he works incredibly quickly, he works well with the client, and his analysis is superb in drilling down into what really matters to advance the best possible case” (Chambers UK Bar – Employment 2022)
“He is a safe pair of hands, he pays great attention to detail, he is hard-working and he can cut through the case” (Chambers UK Bar – Employment 2022)
“Great tactical insight (he will not take weak points), highly commercial in terms of looking at what the client wants as an end game, works incredibly hard under pressure (prepared to put in the hours when needed), great paperwork, great cross-examination, and great advocacy – very client friendly too” (Legal 500 – Employment 2022)
“Very smart and diligent. Very good with numbers” (Legal 500 – Administrative & Public Law 2021 & 2022)
“He’s an excellent all-round barrister; he’s very commercial, gives a pragmatic view and is very impressive on his feet” (Chambers UK Bar – Employment 2021)
“Keeps things simple and to the point, effectively manages the litigation, and makes the key points heard” (Legal 500 – Employment 2021)
“He’s very bright, very helpful and has a very quick turnaround of work” (Chambers UK Bar – Employment 2020)
“A tower of strength with incredible capacity for work and someone you would always want on your team” (Legal 500 – Employment 2020)
“An immensely valuable junior” (Legal 500 – Administrative & Public Law 2020)
“He is laser-focused, client-friendly and a relentless cross-examiner” (Legal 500 – Employment 2019)
“He adopts a collaborative approach and has the ability to get to the crux of a case quickly” (Legal 500 – Employment 2018)
University of Oxford, Bachelor of Civil Law, Distinction & Law Faculty Prize
University College London, Law LLB, First Class