Public, Regulatory and Human Rights
Raphael is ranked as a leading junior in this area by Chambers and Partners, and as a “rising star” by the Legal 500. He has acted for individuals, companies, NGOs, central government departments, regulators and other authorities in public law disputes, including judicial reviews and statutory appeals.
He is particularly interested in the use of public law to advance and defend commercial interests, and has acted in several disputes in which commercial entities have challenged regulatory decisions, procurement processes or subsidy-related decisions.
He also has extensive experience of working on strategic litigation, including obtaining costs-capping orders in public interest proceedings and advising on the interplay between judicial review and wider campaigning strategy.
Raphael is a serious talent in the public law and human rights space. He is one to watch. He’s great to work with – excellent communication, fast, reliable, proactive. A top choice.
Legal 500, 2026
Apple Inc v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2025] UKIPTRIB 1
Acted for Apple, in a claim relating to the Secretary of State’s powers to issue technical capability notices under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, successfully resisting an application for all details of the case to be private.
R (Wikimedia Foundation and BLN) v Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology
[2025] EWHC 2086
Acted for the provider of the Wikipedia service, and an anonymous Wikipedia editor, in the first case brought under the Online Safety Act 2023.
R (Thompson and Carlo) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
[2025] EWHC 2355
Acting for the Met Police in a challenge to the use of live facial recognition in London.
Abbasi v Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
[2025] UKSC 15
Acted for an NGO intervening in a Supreme Court appeal about injunctions preventing the identification of clinicians in end-of-life cases.
R (Shashikanth) v NHS Litigation Authority and NHS England
[2025] 1 WLR 2333
Acted for NHS England in this appeal concerning the amenability to judicial review of a contractual adjudicator.
R (DF) v Essex County Council
[2025] PTSR 806
Acted for the Council in the Court of Appeal in a case concerning the relationship between housing legislation and the Children Act.
R (GB News) v Ofcom
[2024] EWHC 2658 (Admin)
Acted for Ofcom, successfully resisting an application for interim relief in a challenge by GB News to a decision that a Q&A Programme with Rishi Sunak MP breached impartiality rules.
R (IWGB) v Central Arbitration Committee (IP: Deliveroo)
[2024] 2 All ER 1
Acted for Deliveroo in a Lawyer ‘Top 10’ Supreme Court appeal about whether collective bargaining legislation breaches riders’ rights under Article 11 ECHR.
R (West Coast Railway Company Ltd) v Office of Rail and Road
[2024] 4 WLR 12
Acted for the UK’s largest heritage railway company, operator of the so-called ‘Hogwarts Express’ Jacobite service, in a judicial review of a certification decision by the rail regulator.
R (London Borough of Islington) v Secretary of State for Education
[2024] EWCA Civ 951, [2024] EWHC 1798 (Admin)
Acted for the Claimant in proceedings before the High Court and Court of Appeal to challenge to a ‘forced academisation’.
Arkorful v Social Work England
[2024] EWHC 73 (Admin), [2025] EWHC 1456 (Admin)
Acted for the successful regulator in two joined High Court appeals of adjudicators’ decisions in fitness to practise proceedings.
R (Good Law Project) v Prime Minister & Others
[2023] 1 WLR 785
Acted for the Claimant before the High Court and Court of Appeal in a challenge to the use of private email accounts and phones for government business.
R (Gardner & Harris) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
[2022] EWHC 967 (Admin)
Acted for the successful Claimants in a Lawyer ‘Top 20’ challenge to the government’s policies on care homes during the first wave of the pandemic.
R (A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2022] EWHC 360 (Admin)
Acted for the successful Home Secretary in a challenge to the government’s flagship asylum reforms.
R (Good Law Project) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
[2022] EWHC 2888 (TCC)
Successfully obtained a costs-capping order in a challenge to the award of a high-value PPE contract to a firm with links to the former chair of the Conservative Party.
Governors of St John the Divine Primary School v Lambeth Council
STP659
Acted unled for the governors before the Office of the Schools Adjudicator in their successful challenge to the Council’s decision to close their school.







