Currently shortlisted for the 2025 Legal 500 ‘Media and the arts junior of the year’.

Hannah’s practice covers the full ambit of media and information law, including:

  • Defamation
  • Malicious falsehood
  • Privacy
  • Breach of confidence
  • Data protection (including data breach and group litigation)
  • Harassment

Hannah has broad-ranging experience across each of those practice areas and is particularly well placed to deal with actions involving both data/privacy and reputational issues. She has considerable experience in group litigation claims and has acted in large scale commercial actions involving data protection, privacy and defamation. Hannah also has a keen interest in non-contentious reputation management and strategy work. This includes press and social media monitoring on behalf of both individuals and corporations in the public eye.

Case highlights include:

  • A Supreme Court appearance in a landmark privacy action concerning the right of arrestees in child sex offence cases to remain anonymous (Khuja v Times Newspapers Ltd);
  • A Court of Appeal appearance in Lachaux v AOL (UK) Ltd, which gave rise to the first appellate decision on the ‘serious harm test’ under section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013;
  • Acting for the largest group of Defendants between 2014 and 2020 in multi-million-pound litigation concerning the alleged blacklisting of construction workers (The Construction Industry Vetting Information Group Litigation);
  • Acting for English water companies against restitution claims for over £150 million in fees paid for information which it was said ought to have been provided for free (The Environmental Information Regulations Litigation);
  • Acting for the Defendant in Farley v Equiniti, which is set to give rise to the leading Court of Appeal authority on the existence and applicability of a threshold of seriousness in UK data protection law.

Hannah was awarded a 2012 Pegasus Scholarship to work at the New York offices of Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz LLP, where she gained both a broad grounding in American media law and experience in advising on cross-jurisdictional issues.

View more

  • Quotation symbolFiercely intellectual, meticulous in her preparation and attention to detail and provides shrewd advice far beyond her year of call. She is wonderfully understated when packing a punch and fantastic with client.

    Quotation symbolLegal 500 2021
  • Quotation symbolShe is excellent, efficient and supremely bright.

    Quotation symbolLegal 500 2017

Expertise

ToggleRecent cases

Defamation

Richard Lynton-Jones v Baroness Michelle Mone (2022) – acted for Baroness Mone in a libel action arising from comments published by her to the Guardian and via her Instagram page.

 Christopher Chandler v Chris Bryant MP (2022) – libel action successfully brought in relation to allegations of money laundering first made in Parliament (led by Adrienne Page KC). Hannah has acted for Mr Chandler and the Legatum Institute on a range of matters, some of which are ongoing.

Kamirih v Facebook & Ors (2022) – Hannah acted for Facebook in successfully defending an action brought against various internet and technology companies.

Baltaci v Refinitiv Limited (2021) – acted for the Defendant in a libel action brought in relation to Mehmet Baltaci’s “nonconviction terror” categorisation in World-Check.

The Corporate Macfarlanes Defendants v Amec Building Ltd (2020) – acted in Part 20 proceedings brought by the construction companies which comprised the largest group of Defendants in The Construction Industry Vetting Information Group Litigation.

Danielle Hindley v Associated Newspapers Ltd (2020) – Hannah acted for the Claimant in a libel action successfully brought over false allegations in the Mail on Sunday that Ms Hindley was a “rogue beautician” who had “botched” treatments.

The Construction Industry Vetting Information Group Litigation (2014-2020) – for the largest group of Defendant construction companies, led by Andrew Caldecott KC and Edmund Nourse KC, in this high-profile group litigation concerning the alleged blacklisting of construction workers.

Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland [2019] EWCA Civ 648 – for the National Trust for Scotland, prior to maternity leave, in this important libel and data protection matter concerning issues of forum and service.

Paul Lunt v Times Newspapers Limited (2018) – for solicitor Mr Lunt, led by Manuel Barca KC, in a libel action successfully brought in relation to an article published in the Times Newspaper which wrongly identified Mr Lunt as the subject of a serious allegation of criminality.

Lachaux v AOL (UK) Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334 – for AOL, led by Manuel Barca KC and, in the Court of Appeal, by Andrew Caldecott KC, in the first-of-its-kind trial of the preliminary issue of serious harm under section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013.

Rightio Ltd v Twitter Inc. (2016) – for Twitter in relation to an application to disclose information concerning account holders alleged to have published defamatory Tweets.

Gloster v Macmillan Publishers Ltd (2016) – successful strike-out application made on behalf of Macmillan Publishers in relation to an article published in the well-known scientific journal, Nature.

Melvyn Cartwright v Dai Havard MP (2014) – for Member of Parliament, Mr Havard, in a successful application to strike out a defamation claim in the High Court in Cardiff.

Todd v BBC (2014) – for the BBC in relation to an application to disclose information concerning an individual said to have posted a defamatory comment on the BBC News website.

Hank Roberts v Times Newspapers Ltd (2013) – for Mr Roberts, the president of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, in an action against the Sunday Times.

Cairns v Modi [2012] EWCA Civ 1382 – instructed to assist Andrew Caldecott KC in this successful appeal concerning the award of damages in libel actions, with specific responsibility for submissions concerning ‘the grapevine effect’.

Bento v The Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police [2012] EWHC 1525 – for the Defendant police force (with Catrin Evans KC and led by Richard Rampton KC) in a libel action concerning a murder conviction and later acquittal.

Privacy / Data Protection

CR and 473 Ors v Equiniti (ongoing- judgment awaited) – led by Andrew Sharland KC, acting for pension provider, Equiniti, in relation to a claim brought by police officers regarding the sending of their pension statements to outdated addresses. Equiniti has applied to strike out on the basis of triviality.

The Environmental Information Regulations Litigation (ongoing- six week trial listed for November 2023) – led by Timothy Pitt-Payne KC and Edmund Nourse KC for the water companies in what will be a seminal decision regarding the Environmental Information Regulations 2004.

Collins v Crossrail & Ors (2021-) – acting for ten of the sixteen Defendants, led by Anya Proops KC, in relation to alleged blacklisting and the Crossrail Project.

Calvin Ayre v Refinitiv Limited (2021) – acted for the Defendant, led by Anya Proops KC, in a matter concerning the Claimant’s World-Check profile and his categorisation as a “politically exposed person”.

Horsfall v Google LLC (2021) – acted for Google in successfully seeking an order that the court had no jurisdiction to try a ‘right to be forgotten’ claim.

The Corporate Macfarlanes Defendants v Amec Building Ltd (2020) – see above.

The Construction Industry Vetting Information Group Litigation (2014-2019) – see above.

Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland [2019] EWCA Civ 648 – (see above).

Bains & Ors v Moore & Ors v Wetherby Select Ltd & Ors (2017-2018) – acted for various Non-Parties in relation to privacy, breach of confidence and data protection proceedings concerning alleged corporate espionage and the asbestos industry (led by Manuel Barca KC).

Khuja v Times Newspapers Ltd & Others [2017] UKSC 49 – for the Claimant, led by Manuel Barca KC, in an application for an interim non-disclosure order preventing the identity of the Claimant as an arrestee from being disclosed by The Times newspaper. The case gave rise to a landmark privacy decision of the Supreme Court.

Daley v Griffiths (2017) – instructed in relation to a complaint by the Olympic diver Tom Daley concerning the destruction of images and video footage obtained via private communications.

Bonham-Smith v Google UK Ltd (2016) – for Google UK in a successful application to strike out a claim brought on ‘right to be forgotten’ grounds.

Henry Herbert Ltd v Google UK Ltd (2016) – instructed by Google UK in relation to an allegedly defamatory review of the Claimant’s business posted on the ‘Google My Business’ platform.

Secondment to the BBC in order to provide data protection advice (2015) – this followed the alleged disclosure of information by a researcher who had worked for an independent production team in relation to a BBC Panorama investigation into Lutfur Rahman, the Mayor of Tower Hamlets.

Higgins v Totaljobs Group Ltd (2013) – successfully defended a claim brought on data protection grounds against Totaljobs Group Ltd, the UK’s largest online recruitment company.

Inquiries / Inquests:

The Hillsborough inquests (2014) – assisted the BBC Litigation Department in relation to the release of footage for use at the inquests.

The Pollard review into sexual allegations against Jimmy Savile (2013) – instructed as junior counsel by the BBC Litigation Department and the BBC Trust in order to advise on the release to the general public of those documents underlying the Pollard report.

The Leveson inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the British press (2012) – drafted legal submissions on behalf of Associated Newspapers Ltd, Guardian News & Media Ltd and the Telegraph Media Group Ltd.

 

Download Recent cases CV

Achievements

TogglePublications and Seminars

Contributor to Arlidge, Eady & Smith on Contempt, 5th Edition, 2017

Co-author, Atkin’s Court Forms on Defamation

ToggleQualifications

MA (Cantab) (First Class), Law, University of Cambridge (Churchill College)

Silverman Sherliker Award for Legal Excellence; Churchill College Scholarship, 2008

Lord Denning Scholarship; Hardwicke Entrance Award, 2009

Bar Vocational Course, BPP Law School (Outstanding)

Buchanan Prize; Hubert Greenland Scholarship (Lincoln’s Inn), 2010

Pegasus Scholarship (Inns of Court), 2012

Insights&News

  1. View News
  2. View News
  3. View News

View more →

  • Quotation symbol

    A confident and robust junior, and a strong team player.

    Legal 500 2015
  • Quotation symbol

    Has quickly become a rising star in the sector since her 2010 call, and has built up a substantial client base. Peers predict she will be a market-leading barrister in the future.

    Chambers & Partners 2015
  • Quotation symbol

    There is a confidence and maturity to her advice that is beyond her year of call.

    Legal 500 2016
  • Quotation symbol

    She’s very bright and gives good commercial advice.

    Chambers & Partners 2016
  • Quotation symbol

    She’s great; fantastic and willing to roll her sleeves up. She’s very clever, but approachable and user-friendly.

    Chambers & Partners 2016
  • Quotation symbol

    Popular junior whose impressive and diverse practice has developed far beyond the expected level for her year of call.

    Chambers & Partners 2016
  • Quotation symbol

    She is very bright and has excellent judgement.

    Legal 500 2017
  • Quotation symbol

    She is very impressive and gives excellent advice in conference and on paper. A rising star.

    Chambers & Partners 2017
  • Quotation symbol

    She’s an exceptional junior; she’s good at drafting, responsive and hard-working.

    Chambers & Partners 2017
  • Quotation symbol

    Up-and-coming barrister who is quickly establishing a reputation as a leading junior at the Defamation Bar.

    Chambers & Partners 2017
  • Quotation symbol

    She has such a depth of expertise in the data protection area that she is able to comprehensively advise on the spot.

    Legal 500 2018
  • Quotation symbol

    Has a good eye for detail. Gets stuck into difficult matters and is incredibly bright.

    Legal 500 2018
  • Quotation symbol

    She’s bright, hard-working, focused and very easy to work with.

    Chambers & Partners 2018
  • Quotation symbol

    She gets on top of the legal issues immediately, and she’s extremely pleasant to work with

    Chambers & Partners 2019
  • Quotation symbol

    She’s very measured, calm, and authoritative beyond her years.

    Chambers & Partners 2019
  • Quotation symbol

    She is user-friendly, committed and meticulous; a joy to work with.

    Chambers & Partners 2022
  • Quotation symbol

    Bright, hard-working, focused and very easy to work with.

    Chambers & Partners 2019
  • Quotation symbol

    She always brings fresh thinking and a new approach to the discussion.

    Legal 500 2019
  • Quotation symbol

    Very bright junior, clearly going places in the future.

    Legal 500 2019
  • Quotation symbol

    Provides excellent advice in conference and on paper

    Chambers & Partners 2020
  • Quotation symbol

    Razor-sharp and approachable.

    Chambers & Partners 2020
  • Quotation symbol

    Fiercely bright, very much liked by clients, very good on paper, and she has very good judgement.

    Chambers & Partners 2020
  • Quotation symbol

    She is meticulous and has an eye for detail.

    Chambers & Partners 2021
  • Quotation symbol

    She is very thorough and knowledgeable.

    Chambers & Partners 2021
  • Quotation symbol

    Highly intelligent, meticulous and a pleasure to work with.” “Excellent – pragmatic, clear and dependable.

    Chambers & Partners 2021
  • Quotation symbol

    Her strengths include the capacity to balance intellectual legal analysis with a client’s commercial objective

    Legal 500 2022
  • Quotation symbol

    Hannah skilfully balances sound legal analysis with commercial awareness

    Legal 500 2022
  • Quotation symbol

    Her work is always excellent. She is pragmatic, meticulous and user-friendly.

    Chambers & Partners 2022
  • Quotation symbol

    She’s very bright, very personable and ambitious, clear and determined to do a good job.

    Chambers & Partners 2022