Tom Ogg

Tom acts in the full-range of commercial disputes arising out of employment, partnership and LLP arrangements. He is frequently involved in cases in the High Court or in arbitral proceedings concerning post- termination restraints, confidential information, team moves, wrongful termination/expulsion, the economic torts, diversion of opportunities by fiduciaries, directors’ duties, and allegations of conspiracy or inducement. He regularly acts in injunctive proceedings and speedy trials arising from restricted covenants matters.

Tom’s recent cases include:

• FMTS v Friend [2025] EWHC 2897 (KB) (link, link). Tom acted successfully for Mr Friend in this speedy trial concerning Mr Friend’s compliance with his restrictive covenants and duties as a director, led by Gavin Mansfield KC.
• Kamal Sandhu v Barclays. Tom acts for Mr Sandhu in this bonus claim concerning ‘career retirement’, led by Richard Leiper KC. The case generated significant interest in the financial press (e.g. link, link).
• DIFC Team Move. Tom acted for an interdealer brokerage pursuing former employees / LLP members in parallel proceedings in the DIFC and in the UK in relation to a team move, led by Amy Rogers KC.
• LLP dispute. Tom acted for an international law firm in arbitral proceedings brought by a partner of the firm, led by Jane McCafferty KC.
• AstraZeneca PLC v Christopher Sheldon (link, link) Tom was instructed for AstraZeneca in their dispute with Mr Chris Sheldon concerning his non-compete covenant, led by Amy Rogers and Dan Oudkerk KC. The High Court issued an injunction preventing Mr Sheldon joining pharmaceutical industry rival GlaxoSmithKline pending a speedy trial.
• Aon UK Limited v Howden Insurance Brokers Limited (link) Tom acted for Aon UK Limited in its dispute with Howden and its former employee Mr Paul Tubb. Tom was led by Amy Rogers in this alleged team-move and conspiracy case.
• Azets Holdings Limited and ors v Redwood Wales Limited Tom acted for Azets in respect of its claim alleging an unlawful team move involving the diversion of Azets’ employees and clients to Carr Jenkins & Hood, led by David Craig KC.
• Citadel Securities v GSA Capital. (link) Tom for Citadel in this High Court claim in which damages of more than $40m were sought for misuse of confidential information and inducement of breach of contract. Tom was led by Amy Rogers and David Craig KC.
• Your Golf Travel Limited v Lewis Remington. Tom acted as sole counsel for the Claimant in this bitterly contested claim against a former employee for misuse of confidential information, which included an award of indemnity costs against the defendants.
• Tom was instructed in a team-move case in the technology sector in which up to 20 employees were unlawfully poached and confidential information taken to allegedly aid a start-up competitor, in breach of non-compete and non-poach restrictive covenants. Tom acted for the Claimant company and was led by Gavin Mansfield KC.
• Tom acted for the claimant company in a hard-fought LCIA arbitral claim concerning the employee’s alleged disclosure of confidential information to a rival, which followed the High Court issuing an injunction against the employee in support of the arbitral proceedings.

Tom is also instructed in a number of claims for negligent misstatement relating to regulatory references in the financial services industry.

Please see the ‘Employment’ section for details of Tom’s work in the DIFC and QICDRC.

Tom advises and acts in the full range of Employment Tribunal, County Court and High Court proceedings, including on appeal. He regularly appears in multi-day trials in the Employment Tribunal, particularly in relation to whistleblowing and discrimination matters. He also acts in industrial relations and strike matters.

Details of Tom’s High Court and arbitral work are set out in the ‘commercial’ section above, which includes proceedings in relation to confidential information, team moves, wrongful termination/expulsion, the economic torts, diversion of opportunities by fiduciaries, directors’ duties and allegations of conspiracy or inducement.

Tom acts for clients in all industries, but he is particularly sought-after for financial services cases account of his expertise in both financial regulation and employment law, on which Tom frequently advises in tandem (such as in relation to regulatory references). Tom is the co-editor of Conduct and Pay in the Financial Services Industry: the Regulation of Individuals (link), with Richard Leiper KC.

Examples of Tom’s work include:

• Bradley Jones v JP Morgan. A landmark claim in which Mr Jones was awarded c.£1.6m in back-pay on account of his re-engagement following his claim for unfair dismissal. The Financial Times headline at the liability stage was “Ex-JPMorgan trader wins unfair dismissal case over alleged spoofing… Tribunal rules that Bradley Jones did not deserve to be fired and bank acted ‘to appease its regulators’”. See here and here.
• Pejic v Ryanair (link). Tom successfully acted for Ryanair in this territorial and international jurisdiction case, in which the Tribunal determined arguments concerning the post-Brexit applicability of the ‘Bleuse’ principle.
• Mark Reid v SDX Energy PLC (link). Tom acted for Mr Reid in this rare example of a successful whistleblowing claim for dismissal and detriment, without any discount in Mr Reid’s compensation.
• Tata Steel PLC v Unite. Tom acted for Tata Steel in seeking an injunction to restraint Unite the Union from their threatened strike action, which would have resulted in the blast furnace at Port Talbot being shut down prematurely, led by Marcus Pilgerstorfer KC. This case generated significant press coverage e.g. link, link.
• Philp Remillard v JP Morgan (link). Tom acted for Mr Remillard in this unfair dismissal claim concerning spoofing.
• Sports league litigation. Tom acts for a national sport league in defending claims by former employees for unfair dismissal and TUPE-related claims.
• X v Private Equity Firm. Tom acted for the respondent in this significant sex discrimination claim, led by Sean Jones KC.  The case entailed extensive disputes regarding disclosure and further information, across multiple PHs, and settled prior to trial.
• Paul Stephany v Newton Investment Management Limited. (link). An unfair dismissal claim in the context of an FCA individual disciplinary case against Mr Stephany, and the FCA’s first Competition Act 1998 proceedings against a firm.
• Y v Private Equity Firm. Tom acted for a leading private equity firm in a whistleblowing claim brought against it, led by Richard Leiper KC, which settled prior to trial.
• Dipak Khot v HSBC Bank Plc. (link) Tom acted for Dipak Khot in his claim against HSBC.  Mr Khot was a prosecution witness for the US Department of Justice in Mark Johnson’s trial for ‘front running’ a $3.5bn order in the FX market.
• Wallace v Apple Europe Ltd. (link) Tom acted successfully for Apple in this claim for unfair dismissal in a redundancy context.
• Kendall v West Ham United FC Limited. (link) Tom acted for West Ham Football Club in this redundancy / TUPE claim (an instruction which delighted his West Ham-supporting clerks).
• Tom advises a national airport in relation to industrial action by a trade union.
• Tom acted for a leading bank in a claim for sex discrimination brought by a man, instructed by a magic circle firm. The case settled prior to trial.
• Tom acted for a leading energy industry company in a complex whistleblowing claim, in which serious health & safety breaches were alleged.
• Tom acted against a FTSE 100 company in a health & safety whistleblowing claim, including at an interim relief hearing.

Tom is also acting in a number of claims for negligent misstatement relating to regulatory references in the financial services industry.

Examples of the kinds of issues which Tom’s recent ET cases have involved are: • the agency worker regulations / fixed term workers regulations; • equal pay; • the ET’s jurisdiction in relation to unjust enrichment and breach of contract claims; • rule 50 or ‘privacy’ orders; • rule 35 ‘intervenors’ in ET proceedings (see here); • the admissibility of evidence in ET proceedings; • cross-border and jurisdictional issues including territorial jurisdiction and applicable law; • privilege and admissibility disputes; • disclosure and further information, including third-party disclosure orders under rule 31 of the ET rules; • interim relief; • applications for reconsideration of a rejected claim; • the rules concerning ACAS conciliation and certificates; • stays; • costs (including wasted costs); • amendments; • limitation.

Tom’s experience in the Courts in the Middle East include:

• DIFC Team Move. Tom acted for an interdealer brokerage pursuing former employees / LLP members in parallel proceedings in the DIFC and in the UK in relation to a team move, led by Amy Rogers KC.
• Roig v MATCH Hospitality Consultants LLC. (link). Tom acted for the Defendant in this whistleblowing claim brought against the hospitality contractor for the FIFA World Cup in Qatar 2022, in the Qatar International Court in the Qatar Financial Centre.  The Claimant withdrew his claim prior to trial, and the Court awarded costs against the Claimant.
• As’ad vs Fields Investment (DIFC) Limited. (link) Tom acted for the Claimant in this claim in the DIFC Courts.
• Rudolf Veiss v Qatar Financial Centre Authority [2024] QIC (A) 10 (link). Tom acted for Mr Veiss in this appeal against a prohibition and financial penalty in the QFC, which also concerned the scope of the ‘making arrangements’ limb of the regulatory perimeter and financial hardship. Tom was led by Amy Rogers KC.
• A Partner v Management Consultancy. Tom acted for the Claimant in this intended discrimination and whistleblowing claim against a leading consultancy in the Middle East, in the DIFC Courts.
• Employer A v Employer B: Tom advised on the prospects of success of an injunction in the DIFC Courts and a subsequent damages claim as regards the employee’s alleged breach of restrictive covenants.
• UK LTIPs and bonus schemes for DIFC-based employees: Tom has advised on a number of bonus schemes / LTIPs governed by UK law in respect of employees based in Dubai and the DIFC.

Investigations and inquiries

Tom accepts instructions to undertake investigations and inquiries, either as sole investigator or as part of a team of professionals. Tom’s recent investigations include:

• Investigating the alleged conduct of a senior manager in a regulated financial services firm.
• Investigating an alleged child protection matter for a well-known boarding school.
• Tom was instructed by the FICC Market Standards Board to investigate whether a senior member of its staff had inter alia failed to disclose a conflict of interest, namely acting as an expert witness for Deutsche Bank in US civil proceedings (see the subsequent ET proceedings here).
• Investigating allegations that a director was bullying and undermining staff, for an employer in the leisure industry.
• Investigating allegations that a school chaplain had spoken inappropriately to young women in his care.
• Tom completed a long-running inquiry as sole investigator into accounting issues relating to the payment of injury awards at Buckinghamshire and Milton Keynes Fire Authority.
• Tom regularly conducts investigations for a leading professional regulatory body into allegations of misconduct by its members.

Tom also has experience of investigations and proceedings arising from investigations relating to the Financial Conduct Authority.

Tom acts in a range of industries for individuals and regulators in both professional discipline and general regulatory matters, with a particular specialism in financial services, accountancy and the legal sector.

Financial Services

Tom acts for and against the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority in a range of matters, and provides advice in relation to such matters on a regular basis.

Tom is the co-editor of Conduct and Pay in the Financial Services Industry: the Regulation of Individuals (link), with Richard Leiper KC.

Examples of Tom’s recent financial regulatory work includes:

• PRA v Citigroup Global Markets Limited (link). Tom Ogg advised the Prudential Regulation Authority on its enforcement action against Citigroup Global Markets Limited. The PRA fined Citigroup £33.88m (post settlement discount), in its first enforcement action under the Algorithmic Trading Rules. The enforcement action concerned, amongst other things, a trading incident on 2 May 2022, when an erroneously inputted order of US$444bn, was processed by Citi’s trading systems, resulting in a total notional of US$1.4bn sells being executed on European exchanges.
• Rudolf Veiss v Qatar Financial Centre Authority [2024] QIC (A) 10 (link). Tom acted for Mr Veiss in this appeal against a prohibition and financial penalty in the QFC, which also concerned the scope of the ‘making arrangements’ limb of the regulatory perimeter and financial hardship. Tom was led by Amy Rogers KC.
• FCA v William Hofstetter (link). Tom acted for Mr Hofstetter in this prohibition and financial penalty case relating to pension transfer advice by IFAs.
• Advising a firm in respect of sexual harassment allegations against its CEO, in circumstances in which the regulator has taken a significant interest in the matter.
• FCA v Paul Stephany ( Final Notice). Tom acted for Mr Stephany in the disciplinary proceedings brought against him by the FCA. This was the first individual disciplinary case to arise from the FCA’s new competition jurisdiction, and the first case to address the conduct of the buy-side in IPOs. Tom also represented Mr Stephany in his Employment Tribunal proceedings.
• Acting for a range of individuals bringing commercial claims for negligent misstatement as regards regulatory references provided by their former employers.
• Advising a CEO of a UK Bank in relation to his potential claims and his regulatory position, including as regards regulatory references.
• Advising a UK Bank in respect of the exit of its CRO, including as regards regulatory references.
• Tom acted for a CEO and finance director a firm accused of breaches of the market abuse regime and the listing rules.
• Tom also secured a discontinuance of proceedings in an individual approval context, following Enforcement’s consideration of Tom’s written submissions for an RDC hearing, following which the individual was approved.
• VIP Wealth Ltd (link). Tom represented VIP Wealth  at the RDC in their unsuccessful application for Part 4A permission.
• Tom has worked on LIBOR cases and disciplinary proceedings brought against senior individuals, both in private practice and whilst seconded to the FCA.
• He assisted the FCA disciplinary proceedings against the directors of Swinton Group Limited (Peter Halpin, Nicholas Bowyer and Anthony Clare).

In 2013/14 Tom was seconded to the FCA, during which he sat in the Enforcement Division’s Legal Group and in the General Counsel Division. Whilst on secondment, Tom drafted submissions to the Regulatory Decisions Committee and appeared at the FCA’s Regulatory Transactions Committee. In GCD, Tom drafted sections of the FCA Handbook.

Legal

Tom appears in the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal and has advised both the Solicitors Regulation Authority and individuals. Tom represented the Solicitors Regulation Authority in Fessahaye v SRA and has acted for the SRA in a number of other appeals.

Tom acts for the Bar Standard Board in cases brought against members of the Bar. He represented the BSB in its case against Nicola Cain (link), who was disbarred having forged a court order in civil proceedings brought against Christopher Steele – author of the so-called ‘Steele dossier’ on Donald Trump.

Accountancy

Tom has:

• been instructed in disciplinary proceedings brought by hte ICAEW against partners in a leading accountancy firm;
• been instructed by the Financial Reporting Council to draft sections of its rules;
• advised a firm on challenging supervisory decisions of the ICAEW;
• acted in a range of cases concerning questions of compliance with accountancy standards, including the International Financial Reporting Standards.

Membership disputes

Tom appears in domestic tribunals of all kinds. He represented the National Executive Committee of the Labour Party in National Constitutional Committee proceedings in which a member was accused of anti-Semitic abuse.

Education

Tom has advised on matters including disciplinary proceedings against by Ofqual against recognised bodies, National College of Teaching and Leadership proceedings against teachers, and a variety of matters relating to the governance of academies and local authority maintained schools.

Tom acts in a range of administrative law matters, particularly those relating to equality law, regulatory matters, and education.

Tom has experience of the Firefighters Pension Schemes and issues relating to injury awards. He completed a lengthy investigation in relation to the payment of injury awards at Buckinghamshire and Milton Keynes Fire Authority. He has advised a number of fire authorities on similar matters.

Equality law

Tom acts in a range of discrimination and equality matters in the County Court, Employment Tribunal and First-Tier Tribunal. Examples of Tom’s cases include:

• Tom represented the defendant in a County Court disability discrimination claim brought by Mr James Plummer, whose claim was funded by the Equality and Human Rights Commission. The main issues were whether Tom’s client, Royal Herbert, was a service provider, and whether it had failed to make reasonable adjustments to its premises to permit Mr Plummer, a wheelchair user, to access the swimming pool on the estate.
• Tom advised a leading bank on the question of reasonable adjustments in the context of a consumer redress exercise.
• Tom represented a leading independent school in a challenge in the First-Tier Tribunal to its use of an aptitude test in its admissions arrangements.
• Tom represented a leading university in defending a reasonable adjustments claim in the County Court in respect of its admissions procedures.
• Tom represented a national supermarket in a disability discrimination and harassment claim brought against it.
• Tom has advised the Flying Disabled campaign, which aims to ensure that wheelchair users can travel in aeroplanes using their own wheelchair, without having to transfer to a seat (problems relating to which BBC journalist Frank Gardiner has documented).
• R(C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2014] EWHC 2403 (Admin). Tom was instructed by the Treasury Solicitor to assist in the preparation of the evidence for the judicial review.

Public and regulatory law

Tom regularly advises clients in a contested disciplinary context as to their options in public law vis-à-vis regulatory action: see the ‘regulatory’ section above.

• R (BTE) v LB Lambeth (2025). Tom acted for Lambeth in this judicial review of the decision of an Independent Review Panel to uphold the permanent exclusion of a child.
• R (Admiral Wealth Management) v Financial Ombudsman Service. Tom was instructed to act for the FCA, which was an interested party in a judicial review of the brought by Admiral.
• R (Hoebeck) v Financial Ombudsman Service . Tom represented the FOS in defending this judicial review of the ombudsman’s decision.

Education

Tom’s education law practice concentrates on discrimination claims, exclusions, and contractual/negligence issues, particularly in a University context. Tom appears in the High Court, First-Tier Tribunal and the County Court in relation to his education work. Many of his cases have an equalities angle; see the ‘Equality Law’ section above.

• R (BTE) v LB Lambeth (2025). Tom acted for Lambeth in this judicial review of the decision of an Independent Review Panel to uphold the permanent exclusion of a child.
• R (J) v Ofsted. Tom acted for a nursery seeking an interim injunction against Ofsted seeking to restrain the publication of a critical Ofsted report.
• R (ME) v Cornwall Council. Tom acted for the interested party in this judicial review challenging the funding decisions relating to the provision of special education at a sixth-form college.

Tom has been instructed by the University of Oxford in a range of High Court and County Court claims brought against it by current and former students.

Tom has particular expertise in school exclusion matters on account of his previous work as a teacher, and his continued pro bono work on the School Exclusion Project, of which he is a barrister director.

Prior to joining the Bar, Tom was a teacher at the London Boxing Academy Community Project, for teenage boys, many of whom had been permanently excluded from school.