• List by Barristers Seniority
  • List A-Z
  • Heather Emmerson
    Areas of Practice

  • Commercial
  • Commercial - Business Protection
  • Commercial - Commercial Contract
  • Commercial Judicial Review
  • Education
  • Health & Community Care
  • Human Rights
  • Information
  • Media Law
  • Procurement and State Aid
  • Professional Discipline and Regulatory Law
  • Public
  • Public International Law
  • Activity from
    Heather Emmerson

  • Recent cases

    Supreme Court judgment on priority need for accommodation under the Housing Act 1996

    Read More

    Supreme Court lays down the law on the requirements of a fair consultation exercise

    Read More
  • Article

    GDPR Conference 2016 'Role of data protection officer'

    Read More

    Update on Freedom of Information

    Read More
  • News

    Nine 11KBW barristers feature in The Lawyer’s “Top 20 Cases” for 2017

    Read More

    The NPPF - what does it mean?

    Read More
  • Podcast

    Role of data processor and data protection officer (11KBW GDPR Conference 2016)

    Read More

Heather Emmerson

Heather Emmerson

Heather Emmerson

Practice Overview

Heather Emmerson practises in the areas of public law, regulatory law, professional discipline, data protection and information law. She is ranked as a leading junior in Chambers and Partners across all main areas of her practice and described as “fiercely bright”, “a genuine rising star” and “a consummate professional”.  Heather has appeared before a wide range of courts, tribunal and public inquiries and is regularly instructed in proceedings before the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.

Public Law

In the sphere of public law, Heather is instructed by both claimants and public authorities to undertake advisory work and act in litigation. She has particular expertise of judicial review proceedings. Her public law practice spans a broad range of areas including housing, immigration, human rights, education, healthcare, planning and environmental and local government law. Heather has been involved in a number of high profile public law cases including three recent cases before the Supreme Court (R (Stirling) v Haringey London Borough Council [2014] UKSC 56 which is the leading authority on consultation, Hotak v Southwark London Borough Council [2015] UKSC 30 concerning the “priority need” provisions of the Housing Act 1996 and McDonald v McDonald [2016] UKSC 28 concerning article 8 defences to claims for possession proceedings brought by private landlords). Heather is featured as a leading public law junior in the legal directories and described as “incredibly bright and combines that with being practical and user-friendly”, “incredibly bright, user-friendly and her written pleadings are eloquent and focused", “extremely good, intelligent and provides clear advice" and “a real rising star, and outstanding for her level of seniority”. Heather has particular expertise in local government law and is regularly instructed to advise local authorities on a range of public law issues and bringing and defending claims. Heather is ranked as a leading junior in local government law and described as “versatile, bright and highly personable” in this field. Heather is a member of the Attorney General’s C Panel of Treasury Counsel.

Regulatory law and professional discipline

Heather has extensive experience in the field of regulatory law and professional discipline including advising regulatory bodies and regulated individuals and firms. She is frequently instructed in disciplinary proceedings and High Court claims in this area. Heather regularly appears before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal and is also instructed in wide range of judicial review proceedings and statutory appeals relating to the regulation of lawyers and medical professionals. Heather is ranked as a leading junior in Legal 500 and Chambers and Partners in the sphere of professional discipline and described as “hardworking, intelligent and charming to work with", “incredibly bright, practical and user-friendly, “a wonderful advocate” and “a genuine rising star, she is a consummate professional in terms of application, preparation and presentation.”

Data Protection and information law

Heather is an experienced data protection and information law practitioner. She regularly advises on data protection and information law issues, both in the context of public authorities and the private sector, and has extensive experience of appearing in both the First Tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal in FOIA cases and dealing with civil litigation (both County Court and High Court) relating to data protection issues.  Heather is currently instructed in relation to i) a ground-breaking group litigation claim arising from a data breach at a FTSE 100 company, ii) an appeal due to be heard by the Supreme Court in July 2017 relating to the retention of historic gender data of transgender customers by the Department for Work and Pensions and iii) a number of claims before the European Court of Human Rights relating to the retention of biometric data and conviction information. Heather is a public law and human rights specialist and is able to apply her experience and knowledge of article 8 issues to the sphere of data protection. Heather also has a keen interest in media law and was instructed as part of the team of Counsel to the Inquiry on the Leveson Inquiry in relation to the press and the media. She is ranked as a leading junior in this area in Chambers and Partners and described as “fiercely bright."

Heather is a member of the Administrative Law Bar Association and the Association of Regulatory and Disciplinary Lawyers. Before coming to the Bar, Heather graduated from St Catharine’s College, Cambridge with a first class degree in Law.

WHAT THE DIRECTORIES SAY

2017

"She is fiercely bright." (Chambers and Partners 2017, Data Protection)
"She is incredibly bright and combines that with being practical and user-friendly."(Chambers and Partners 2017, Administrative and Public law)
“She is incredibly bright, practical and user-friendly. She's a wonderful advocate.” and “A genuine rising star, she is a consummate professional in terms of application, preparation and presentation.” (Chambers and Partners 2017, Professional Discipline)
Heather has been ranked as a leading junior in Legal 500 (Professional discipline) in Band 3.

2016

She has also been ranked as a leading junior in Chambers and Partners 2016 (Administrative and Public law) in Band 4 and listed as an ‘Up and Coming’ Barrister in Local Government law.
"She is incredibly bright, user-friendly and her written pleadings are eloquent and focused" (Chambers and Partners 2016, Administrative and Public law).
"Heather is extremely good, she is intelligent and provides clear advice" (Chambers and Partners 2016, Administrative and Public law).
"Versatile, bright and highly personable" (Chambers and Partners 2016, Local Government law).
Heather is also ranked as a leading junior in Legal 500 2015 (Professional Discipline and Regulatory Law) in Band 4.

2015

"Hardworking, intelligent and charming to work with" (Legal 500 2015, Professional Discipline and Regulatory Law).
“She is a real rising star, and outstanding for her level of seniority. Her written work is excellent, and she is very personable” (Chambers and Partners 2015, Administrative and Public law)
“She made an immediately good impression. She staggered everyone with the grasp she had of the case” (Chambers and Partners 2015, Administrative and Public law)
“Down to earth, sensible, practical, and more knowledgeable about the law than she deserves to be at her age.” Chambers and Partners 2014, Administrative and Public law)

 

Cases

Public Law

Hotak v Southwark London Borough Council
[2015] UKSC 30, [2015] 2 WLR 1341, SC, May 13 2015
Assessing vulnerability of housing applicant if made homeless – Whether correct comparator ordinary homeless person.

R (Plantagenet Alliance) v Secretary of State for Justice and others
[2015] LGR 172, [2014] EWHC 1662 (QB), QBD (Div Ct), May 24 2014
Council was under no duty to consult before deciding to reinter the remains of Richard III in Leicester Cathedral.

R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2015] 1 WLR 567, [2014] EWCA Civ 718, CA, May 23 2014
A prisoner had been lawfully detained pending deportation, but his detention became unlawful when it became clear that there was no longer any prospect of deportation within a reasonable time.

R (Stirling) v Haringey London Borough Council
[2014] UKSC 56, [2014] 1 WLR 3947; Times, November 5 2014, SC, October 29 2014
Council tax reduction scheme – Council had not conducted fair consultation process – But not proportionate to order the council to undertake a fresh consultation exercise.

R (Plantagenet Alliance Ltd) v (1) Secretary of State for Justice; (2) University of Leicester  
[2013] EWHC 3164 (Admin), [2014] ACD 26
Instructed as junior counsel in an application to set aside a protective costs order granted in favour of the Claimant in a judicial review concerning the burial of King Richard III.

Instructed as junior counsel in an appeal heard by the Court of Appeal concerning the meaning of priority need under section 189 of the Housing Act 1996 (Hotak v London Borough of Southwark [2013] EWCA Civ 515).

Instructed as junior counsel in a challenge to detention of a foreign prisoner. The case raised a number of complex legal points relating to the Secretary of State’s powers of detention and extent to which this power is vitiated by material public law errors.

Instructed as junior counsel (with Clive Sheldon QC) in a challenge to a Council Tax Reduction Scheme adopted by the London Borough of Haringey. The judicial review claim was successfully defended in the High Court and the Court of Appeal (Stirling v London Borough of Haringey [ 2013] EWCA Civ 116.)

Instructed in a number of judicial review claims challenging the lawfulness of detention of foreign national prisoners, and in particular bringing claims on behalf of a number of Iranian detainees following the closure of the Iranian embassy in London in November 2011.

Appeared in the High Court and the Court of Appeal as junior counsel (led by Philip Coppel QC) in a case challenging the legality of the imposition of parking charges for motorcycles in Westminster: [2010] EWHC 1825 (Admin) and [2011] EWCA Civ 432.

Planning and Environmental Law

Instructed as junior counsel (with James Goudie QC) in a judicial review claim challenging the sale of land to a developer on the grounds of breach of s.123 of the Local Government Act 1972 (London Jewish Girls High Ltd v LB Barnet (2013) LGR 387).

Instructed as sole counsel in a 3 day planning inquiry relating to an appeal against an enforcement notice.

Heather was instructed by a local planning authority in a 3 day planning appeal against a refusal to permit a significant mixed used scheme in North London.

Heather acted for a local authority in confirming a public footpath over land adjacent to the River Thames in Marlow.

Commercial Business Law

In 2010-2011 Heather was instructed as junior counsel in complex litigation over a twelve month period involving a claim of misrepresentation and a petition of unfair prejudice under the Companies Act 2006.

Drafting a claim issued in the High Court alleging breach of directors duties, fiduciary duties, and misuse of confidential information.

Acting for an energy supplier in a contractual dispute arising from non-payment for supply of electricity.

Acting for a property developer in a construction dispute arising from defective work.

Regulatory and Disciplinary Law

Instructed by the Solicitors Regulatory Authority as junior counsel (with Hodge Malek QC) in a case concerning mortgage fraud and breach of the provisions of the CML Handbook.

Instructed by the Solicitors Regulatory Authority as junior counsel (with Mark Cunningham QC) in a case concerning conflict of interest and lack of independence on the part of a solicitor.

Instructed as sole counsel by the Solicitors Regulatory Authority in relation to proceedings arising from misappropriation of client funds.

Instructed on behalf of a solicitor (with Hodge Malek QC) to appear in the SDT in a case arising from over-billing of clients.

Information Law

Instructed by the Information Commissioner in a case before the Information Tribunal concerning the neither confirm nor deny provisions.


Regulatory Information

All members of Chambers are registered with the Bar Standards Board of England and Wales. For general terms and conditions on which services are provides - click here


Professional title: Barrister


Full name (as registered with Bar Standards Board of England and Wales):
Heather Emmerson


VAT Number:


Legal Status: Sole Practitioner


Professional Insurance: All members of Chambers have professional liability insurance provided by the Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund Ltd - click here for details


Territorial coverage is world-wide, subject to the terms of the Bar Mutual, which may be found here


Should you wish to make a complaint - click here